Federal judge blocks Kentucky Medicaid work requirement

A federal judge on Friday blocked [opinion, PDF] a proposed Kentucky Medicaid plan that would include work requirements as a condition of receiving the state’s subsidized health coverage.

Under the proposed Kentucky plan, titled Kentucky HEALTH, the state would impose “community-engagement” requirements for both traditional and expansion Medicaid populations. It also included a new mandate that would require that those recipients work (or participate in other qualifying activities) for at least 80 hours each month as a condition of receiving health coverage. The project also called for, among other things, increased premiums and more stringent reporting requirements.

US District Judge James Boasberg wrote that the HHS Secretary failed to question the impact on health care — an omission that was “arbitrary and capricious.”

At bottom, the record shows that 95,000 people would lose Medicaid coverage, and yet the Secretary paid no attention to that deprivation. Nor did he address how Kentucky HEALTH would otherwise help ‘furnish . . . medical assistance.’ In other words, he glossed over ‘the impact of the state’s project’ on the individuals whom Medicaid ‘was enacted to protect.’

The complaint was filed in January [JURIST report] in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] by three organizations representing 15 Kentucky Medicaid recipients, who argued that the change would harm Kentuckians across the state by limiting their access to health services, including check-ups, diabetes treatment, mental health services, blood pressure monitoring and treatment, and vision and dental care.

Former Trump administration acting Secretary of Health and Human Services [official website] Eric Hargan approved [JURIST report] states’ Medicaid work requirements in January.

 

2 comments
  1. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your blog? My website is in the very same area of interest as yours and my visitors would certainly benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Podcast: Metro Atlanta transit expansion, distracted driving law, the latest immigration debate

The latest immigration debate, Metro Atlanta transportation and the hands-free driving law are the focus of the latest Politically Georgia podcast episode. You can subscribe and listen to Politically Georgia…
View Post

American Bar Association plans to remove Arizona Summit Law School’s accreditation

A private Phoenix law school told its students and faculty by email late Friday that the American Bar Association plans to pull the school’s accreditation. The decision, which is subject to…
View Post

Licensed conveyancers forced into online price publication

(lawsiteblog) Conveyancers will be required to publish their service standards and prices online, a niche regulator has confirmed. The Council for Licensed Conveyancers today announced it will mandate that firms increase the information…
View Post

US judge sentences Liberian war criminal to 30 years for immigration fraud

A US federal judge on Thursday sentenced [press release] a former Liberian commander known as “Jungle Jabbah” to 30 years in prison for defrauding the US immigration authorities and lying…
View Post

Dataism vs. Privacy-Facebook in the Spotlight

The Challenge of Policing Facebook Are our institutions up to the challenge of protecting users from information-age problems? This is the high-level question emerging from the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica debate. While…
View Post